I was so
impressed with judging the Queen of the Nile and sponsoring my own contest
that, in the past, I recommended that everyone try a contest. With a bit of
experience behind me now, I realize that contests are not for everyone.
I used to think that contests were not for goddess types. I
thought that people who dance from the heart and feel that dance is a means
of personal expression that is beautiful regardless of how well trained a
person is could not appreciate the point system of contests. I was wrong
about that. At this year’s East Coast Belly Dance Classic, I saw that this
philosophy does not interfere with a dancer’s ability (but perhaps not
philosophy) to execute and appreciate routines that have a high technical and
artistic ability. Goddess dancers can enter and do well.
I’d heard it said that dancers with a folkloric, Turkish, or
fusion style shouldn’t compete. The level of difficulty and technicality was
not high enough to win. I do not agree with that. I find that people who do
what is closest to their heart have a genuineness that translates into
passion and joy that the audience can see. If that is coupled with technical
expertise, that can score well, so non-Egyptian style dancers can enter
contests and do well.
So if philosophy and style should not exclude dancers, what
should? Attitude.
If you go into it thinking that you are the queen of the world
and no one can possibly beat you, you are likely to be in for disappointment.
People have good days. People have bad days. Even if you are a better dancer
than dancer X 90% of the time, at least one day lands on a 10% day. Contest
day could be it. Confidence is a good thing. Overconfidence is a bad thing.
But the problem isn’t that you had a bad day, but the attitude
about it. People who are fixated on winning usually don’t make good losers.
Bad losers blame other people for their bad day. Instead of finding out what
went wrong so that they can fix it, they may attack the winner’s character or
dance ability, or question the integrity of the contest, or say that the
judge’s were unqualified. Wherever they put the blame, it usually isn’t on
themselves. When we point the finger outward, we waste energy because all we
have control over is ourselves. All we can change is ourselves.
On the opposite end of the spectrum is the bad loser who heaps
all the blame on herself. She beats herself up for not practicing more or for
making a small mistake. She is hypercritical. She follows her performance
with negative self-talk and may cry and get depressed about it. This person
is not a good contest candidate either because the experience is too painful.
It’s not constructive.
At their best, contests are meant to be fun events that challenge
contestants to do their best. They can provide expert analysis at a very low
fee and push you to being an even better dancer by exposing you to stellar
talent. What makes it personally successful should be whether you came left
with more than you came with. It shouldn’t be limited by style or philosophy.
If a contest is not fun for you or the other people around you, you probably
aren’t a good candidate for contests. They really aren’t for everyone.